![]() ![]() We can add also Richfaces, Primefaces, IceFaces, MyFaces, etc. Note that Vaadin does have a passably good templating system and the Eclipse plugin offers a (somewhat buggy) Visual Designer. This tutorial explains you what a Java JSF (Java Server Faces) is and will provide you. I have analyzed both, I am using RichFaces since 6 months. Finally it depends on your requirement which to use. The D2D approach caused integration problems with other frameworks such as PrimeFaces, Richfaces and OpenFaces. RichFaces has better AJAX support than ICEfaces. ICEfaces is heavy in memory use than RichFaces. It seems RichFaces was the leader with JSF 1.2 and maybe will regain dominance with JSF 2 soon - especially if PrimeFaces remains basically a one developer project and continues releasing unstable code. ICEfaces provides more good looking components than RichFaces. Vaadin is certainly superior to any other framework other than perhaps Wicket in terms of performance however this type of UI Framework has one important drawback in my mind: you are locked into coding in pure Java so the separation of skill sets which you would normally use for building a Frontend, middle and backend is not as good as for JSF. IceFaces requires you pay money to get their good components and they use a special framework which is questionnable. including Liferay Faces Alloy, Primefaces, ICEfaces, and RichFaces. again will be RichFaces, ICEfaces, and PrimeFaces (good luck keeping up. This means 2.0.0 RC will be a week later, hopefully mid november. October 5th is the 0.9.3 release and early november will be the 1.0.0 RC release. Regarding JSF 2.0, It'll be ready once PrimeFaces 1.0 is out on november. RF seems to customize jQuery, and since PF gets included last. Write us about your favorite JSF library and well add support for it asap. It is non ui so can work with richfaces as well. I am getting two versions of jQuery included in the page, one from PF and one from RF. I am trying to use both Primefaces 5 and Richfaces 4.1 in a page, and I am getting jQuery collisions. ![]() PF is not without reason the premier JSF UI Framework. Or have you been writing web apps using JSF that youd like to use in Liferay DXP. I've done quite a bit of searching for a workaround, but nothing suggested has worked so far. Now I haven't been back to IceFaces for a while now and I am unlikely to return to it unless a project expressly requires this.Īnother reason for my choice of PF over IF and other RIA class frameworks is that the finished product looks and feels much smoother. Which view technology/framework would be most feasible to leverage. Our basic requirements are look and feel, simplicity and ease of development, scalability and performance (most important). I have experience in both IF and PF and one of the main reasons why I changed to PF was because PF is generally a lot easier to develop with. For the view layer, we have to choose between Primefaces, Icefaces 2 (since we definitely want JSF2) and Richfaces. Pick a Use Case that was quite difficult to implement using IceFaces and reproduce it using PrimeFaces.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |